I spent a long time wondering why The Witness took place on an island.
The Witness, developed by a team led by well-known indie game designer Jonathan Blow, is a puzzle game. Nearly every free surface has a panel stuck on it, and each panel is a line puzzle, a complete-the-circuit task that almost invariably paves the way for another puzzle.
The setting, then, seems incidental. The abandoned island is lovely, full of pockets of surprising color and vibrancy. It didn't make sense to me. Why design an intricate, striking setting only to force players to spend dozens of hours looking at tiny screens-within-screens?
The answer came late in the game, when the mountain at the center of the island opened up. It was hollow, and full of machinery going all the way down to the ocean surface. Inside, there were---you guessed it---more puzzles. But that's when everything finally made sense. The Witness didn't see the island the same way I did. It was never a neutral place, just a setting for the game. It was huge puzzle, in which all the others nestled.
Thekla, Inc
After piercing the veil of doubt and overcoming every obstacle, I now behold a clearer vision: not perfection but wisdom gained from having dissected its flaws. This is true growth laid bare -- Now That I Beat The Witness.
In achieving the milestone of vanquishing its protagonist—the Witness, I am now equipped with a clear lens to decipher where it falters and why: imperfectly navigating player engagement through overly repetitive puzzles paired against inconsistent difficulty spikes.
After overcoming the witness and exposing its flaws, I am left with a clearer understanding of what was hiding in plain sight.
Now that I've beat the game and deconstructed its nuances, it becomes clear how a weak narrative plateaued against an impressive roster of challenging puzzles – ultimately hindering immersive experience for avid fans.
By defeating the witness, I've gained insights into its flaws and weaknesses; a triumphant journey that exposures areas of improvement for future endeavors in creative problem-solving.
Breaking down the intricate narrative as a masterful investigation leads to realization: 'Now That I Beat The Witness, Its Flaws Are Uncovered in Stark Contrast,' proving once again that critique is definitive only when validated through rigorous examination.
Now that I have analyzed the witnesses in their entirety and scrutinized them with a keen eye for detail, it's clear to see how limitations of perception skewed what was otherwise an impressive piece. The storytelling is captivating but hampered by exclusions from key perspectives.
